Affiliation:
1. Department of Sport Science and Physical Education University of Agder Kristiansand Norway
Abstract
Key points
The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated.
While it is unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted.
Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and valuing reviews as a contribution to the literature.
The proposal would require more transparency than is currently the industry norm to prevent unwanted effects.
We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.
Subject
Communication,Library and Information Sciences
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献