Assessing the Art + feminism Edit-a-thon for Wikipedia literacy, learning outcomes, and critical thinking-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessing the Art + feminism Edit-a-thon for Wikipedia literacy, learning outcomes, and critical thinking

Published:2020-09-15 Issue: Volume: Page:1-13
ISSN:1049-4820
Container-title:Interactive Learning Environments
language:en
Short-container-title:Interactive Learning Environments

Author:

Vetter Matthew A.¹^ORCID,Sarraf Krista Speicher¹,Woods Elin¹

Affiliation:

1. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Education

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10494820.2020.1805772

Reference42 articles.

1. The future of rational-critical debate in online public spheres

2. Bazely, D. (2018, October 8). Why Nobel prize winner Donna Strickland didn’t have a Wikipedia page. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2018/10/08/why-nobel-winner-donna-strickland-didnt-have-wikipedia-page/?utm_term=.cedfbbe4ae8e

3. History Writing and Wikipedia

4. Assigning Students to Edit Wikipedia: Four Case Studies

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Inverting {{Citation needed}}: critical design reflection of a citation learning game;Learning, Media and Technology;2023-08-07

2. Digital transformation and digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions: a systematic literature review;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2023-07-07

3. Defying easy categorization: Wikipedia as primary, secondary and tertiary resource;Insights the UKSG journal;2023

4. Digital education tools for critical thinking development;Thinking Skills and Creativity;2022-06

5. Wikipedia as Open Educational Practice: Experiential Learning, Critical Information Literacy, and Social Justice;Social Media + Society;2022-01