Wikipedia as Open Educational Practice: Experiential Learning, Critical Information Literacy, and Social Justice

Author:

McDowell Zachary J.1ORCID,Vetter Matthew A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Illinois at Chicago, USA

2. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA

Abstract

Building on previous research related to information literacy and learning with Wikipedia, this article interprets Wikipedia editing practices as fulfilling the Association of College and Research Libraries’ (ACRL) Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education to better understand Wikipedia pedagogy as an Open Educational Practice (OEP) that promotes critical information literacy and social justice. Drawing primarily on data from a large-scale study conducted with students and instructors engaged in Wikipedia-based assignments in the fall of 2016, the authors explore how Wikipedia-based pedagogies directly map on to knowledge practices and dispositions related to authority, information value and process, research, and scholarship as conversation, as presented in the ACRL’s Framework. Description and analysis of these “frames,” and the relevant policies and pedagogical practices engaged in Wikipedia-based assignments, ultimately underscore how viewing Wikipedia as enabling OEPs promotes social justice through improving knowledge equity, understanding and combating systemic biases, and supporting first-generation students’ success.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Communication,Cultural Studies

Reference46 articles.

1. Ayers P., Zanni A. (2017). At scale, at large: Wikipedia & libraries. AIB Studi, 57(1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-11560

2. Bond S. (2020, October 30). Black and Latino voters flooded with disinformation in election’s final days. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/10/30/929248146/black-and-latino-voters-flooded-with-disinformation-in-elections-final-days

3. Brown A. R. (2011). Wikipedia as a data source for political scientists: Accuracy and completeness of coverage. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(2), 339–343. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41319920

4. Catalani L. (2017). Libraries and Wikimedia: Common strategies for open access to knowledge and collaborative construction of free knowledge. JLIS.it, 8(3), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12413

5. Cummings R., DiLauro F. (2017). Student perceptions of writing with Wikipedia in Australian higher education. First Monday, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i6.7488

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3