Finding Space and Managing Distance: Public School Choice in an Urban California District

Author:

Andre-Bechely Lois1

Affiliation:

1. Charter College of Education, California State University Los Angeles, 5151 State University Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90032-8143, USA,

Abstract

The paper examines sociospatial issues for two forms of school choice that are popular in the US, magnet schools and charter schools. It argues that geographical analyses can be taken up to expand understandings of such issues as the spatial organisation of race in public school choice plans, how rapidly increasing immigrant student populations impact classroom space in urban districts and parents' everyday challenges managing the distances between home and school. The geographical analysis of data from a two-year ethnographic study of a large school district in the Los Angeles metropolitan region found that, by offering choice to those who are unable to accomplish choice unless they have necessary resources such as time and supports such as transport, districts may inadvertently be perpetuating the historical inequities and inequalities that have stubbornly embedded themselves into the sociospatial relations of urban schooling.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Urban Studies,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Reference59 articles.

1. Balkin, J. M. (Ed.) (2001) What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said. New York: New York University Press.

2. Education Markets, Choice and Social Class: the market as a class strategy in the UK and the USA

3. Circuits of Schooling: A Sociological Exploration of Parental Choice of School in Social Class Contexts

4. Blank, R.K., Levine, R.E. and Steel, L. (1996) After fifteen years: magnet schools in urban education , in: B. Fuller and R. F. Elmore (Eds) Who Chooses? Who Loses? Culture, Institutions, and the Unequal Effects of School Choice, pp. 154-172. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3