Effectiveness fettered by bureaucracy : why surveillance technology is not evaluated-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Effectiveness fettered by bureaucracy : why surveillance technology is not evaluated

Published:2020-06-12 Issue:7 Volume:35 Page:1026-1041
ISSN:0268-4527
Container-title:Intelligence and National Security
language:en
Short-container-title:Intelligence and National Security

Author:

Cayford Michelle,Pieters Wolter

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,History

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02684527.2020.1772539

Reference34 articles.

1. Trilemma policy convergence patterns and output volatility

2. Anderson, D. W. K. “Report of the Bulk Powers Review.” 2016. Accessed April 24, 2018. https://nls.ldls.org.uk/welcome.html?ark:/81055/vdc_100035016622.0x000001

3. Through the PRISM Darkly

4. Bigo, D., S. Carrera, N. Hernanz, J. Jeandesboz, J. Parken, F. Ragazzi, and A. Scherrer. “National Programmes for Mass Surveillance of Personal Data in EU Member States and Their Compatibility with EU Law.” European Parliament, 2013. Accessed January 10, 2018. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/493032/IPOL-LIBE_ET(2013)493032_EN.pdf

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Unravelling effectiveness in intelligence: a systematic review;Intelligence and National Security;2024-06-28

2. Exploring the surveillance technology discourse: a bibliometric analysis and topic modeling approach;Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence;2024-06-06

3. La inteligencia como organización burocrática: disfunciones del modelo weberiano;Revista Científica General José María Córdova;2021-04-01