Russia’s approach to South China Sea territorial dispute: it’s only business, nothing personal-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Russia’s approach to South China Sea territorial dispute: it’s only business, nothing personal

Published:2021-01-04 Issue: Volume: Page:1-30
ISSN:0951-2748
Container-title:The Pacific Review
language:en
Short-container-title:The Pacific Review

Author:

Dikarev Andrey¹,Lukin Alexander²

Affiliation:

1. Center for East Asian and Shanghai Cooperation Organization Studies, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russia

2. Department of International Relations and the International Laboratory on World Order Studies and the New Regionalism, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University), Moscow, Russia

Funder

MGIMO University

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09512748.2020.1866652

Reference74 articles.

1. Blank, S. (2014, April 7). Russia and Vietnam team up to balance China. The National Interest. Retrieved August 10, 2020, from https://nationalinterest.org/commentary/russia-vietnam-team-balance-china-10195/.

2. Briefing by Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova. (2016, July 14). Moscow. Retrieved on August 10, 2020 from: https://www.mid.ru/en/brifingi/-/asset_publisher/MCZ7HQuMdqBY/content/id/2354135#13.

3. Comment by the Ministry on SCO Secretary- General Rashid Alimov’s statement on South China Sea issue. (2016, May 26). Retrieved on August 10, 2020 from https://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2292783.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Don’t let a good crisis go to waste: China’s response to the Russia–Ukraine war;International Politics;2023-09-19

2. Omnibalancing in China-Russia relations: regime survival and the specter of domestic threats as an impetus for bilateral alignment;Post-Soviet Affairs;2023-06-19

3. Obsession „innere Sicherheit“;osteuropa;2023

4. The Paradox of Sino-Russian Partnership: Global Normative Alignment and Regional Ontological Insecurity;The United States and Contemporary China-Russia Relations;2022