Abstract
Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) research was introduced in the 1990s as part of an effort to carry out responsible research in human genetics and genomics. Since then it has become a common practice associated with large-scale research in the life sciences. This article argues that ELSI research that is suitable for Korea society should (a) focus on high-priority and specific issues, (b) relate directly to ongoing scientific research, and (c) be informed by a broad range of academic disciplines, including not only law and ethics, but also economics, anthropology and other areas of the humanities and social sciences. It is an essential task of ELSI researchers in Korea to create an environment in which top-down and bottom-up research can be combined to reflect the perspectives of variety of groups and perspectives. A further objective of ELSI research is to establish a research infrastructure to facilitate communication between researchers, the public, the government, and other stakeholders.
Publisher
The Korean Society for Medical Ethics
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference28 articles.
1. NIH National Human Genome Research Institute(NHGRI). ELSI Planning and Evaluation History [Internet]. Available from: https://www.genome.gov/10001754/elsi-planning-and-evaluation-history. Accessed 15 May 2022.
2. NIH National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Research Program [Internet]. Available from: https://www.genome.gov/Funded-Pro-grams-Projects/ELSI-Research-Program-ethical-legal-social-implications. Accessed 15 May 2022.
3. Kraft SA, Porter KM, Duenas DM, Guerra C, Joseph G, Lee SSJ, et al. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study. Ajob Empir Bioeth 2020;12(1):111. 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823907 32981477 PMC7785634
4. McGuire AL, Beskow LM. Informed Consent in Genomics and Genetic Research. Annu Rev Genom Hum G 2010;11(1):361-81. 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141711 20477535 PMC3216676
5. Ruhl GL, Hazel JW, Clayton EW, Malin BA. Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing. AMIA Annu Symposium Proc 2019;774-83. PMID: 32308873. PMCID: PMC7153088