EU Harmonisation of Norms Regulating Detention: Is EU Competence (Art. 82(2)b TFEU) Fit for Purpose?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

EU Harmonisation of Norms Regulating Detention: Is EU Competence (Art. 82(2)b TFEU) Fit for Purpose?

Published:2022-07-29 Issue:3 Volume:28 Page:465-481
ISSN:0928-1371
Container-title:European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur J Crim Policy Res

Author:

Wieczorek Irene^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe EU has acquired the competence to harmonise individual rights in the field of criminal procedure (Art. 82(2)b TFEU). This was hailed as a positive development helping redress the unbalance towards a too security-oriented development of the Area of Freedom Security and Justice. This article discusses the breath of this competence and designs an analytical framework illustrating what requirements need taking into account to legitimate EU regulatory action in the field of detention. It argues that the wording of the provision, especially its utilitarian framing, strongly limits its potential for the EU to act in at least two areas, compensation for unjust detention and material detention conditions.

Funder

Fondation Philippe Wiener - Maurice Anspach

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10610-022-09521-x.pdf

Reference32 articles.

1. Arroyo Zapatero, L., & Munoz de Morales Romero, M. (2012). Droit Penal europeen et Traité de Lisbonne: Le cas de l’harmonisation autonome (article 83.1 TFEU). In G. Giudicelli-Delage, C. Lazerges, (Eds.), Le droit pénal de l’Union Européenne au lendemain du Traité de Lisbonne (pp. 113–140). Société de législation comparée.

2. Baker, E., Harkin, T., Mitsilegas, V., & Peršak, N. (2020). The need for and possible content of EU pre-trial detention rules. Eucrim, 16(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-020

3. Bard, P., & Van Ballegooij, W. (2019). The effect of CJEU case law concerning the rule of law and mutual trust on national systems. In V. Mitsilegas, A. di Martino, & L. Mancano (Eds.), The Court of Justice and European Criminal Law (pp. 455–467). Hart Publishing.

4. Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, Recommendation (2006) 13 on the use of re-mand in custody, the conditions in which it takes place and the provision of safeguards against abuse of 27 September 2006.

5. Council of Ministers of the European Union, Resolution of the Council of 30 November 2009 on a Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings (Text with EEA relevance) [2009] OJ C 295/1

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Towards an Evidence-Based Approach to Pre-trial Detention in Europe;European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research;2022-08-16