Towards an Evidence-Based Approach to Pre-trial Detention in Europe

Author:

Martufi Adriano,Peristeridou ChristinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis editorial seeks to introduce the special issue Towards an Evidence-Based Approach to Pre-trial Detention in Europe. It explains the state of the field surrounding the legal practice of pre-trial detention and why an interdisciplinary approach is warranted. Pre-trial detention is an instrument in criminal procedure that has been reportedly overused in several European systems, but the reasons remain partly unexplored. While legal scholarship continues to focus predominantly on the legal framework, more disciplines are involved in the way this applies in practice. This special issue gathers contributions from political scientists, (forensic) psychologists, criminologists and jurists who approach this phenomenon from different angles and therefore provide a deeper and more evidence-based understanding of how its practice operates. The special issue is structured along four themes highlighting the trends in scholarship regarding pre-trial detention, namely decision-making, risk-prediction, legal culture, and harmonisation. The editorial elucidates the narrative of the special issue and briefly presents the key points of each contribution.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law

Reference27 articles.

1. Ashworth, A. (2006). Four threats to the presumption of innocence. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof., 10(4), 241–279. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijep.10.4.241

2. Cape, E., Smith, T. (2016). The practice of pre-trial detention in England and Wales. University of the West of England. Available at https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/917566. Accessed 12/8/2022

3. Chanenson S. L., Hyatt J. M. (2016). The use of risk assessment at sentencing: Implications for research and policy. Working Papers Series, Villanova Univ. Charles Widger Sch. of Law Pub. Law & Legal Theory. Available at https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1201&context=wps. Accessed 12/8/2022

4. De Vries, G. M. (2022). De recidivegronden voor voorlopige hechtenis getoetst aan artikel 5 EVRM: Drie aandachtspunten voor een verdragsconforme Nederlandse praktijk. Nederlands Juristenblad, 2022(17), 1380–1385. [NJB 2022/1076].

5. Dhami, M. K., & van den Brink, Y. (2022). A multi-disciplinary and comparative approach to evaluating pre-trial detention decisions: Towards evidence-based reform. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, This Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3