Formalizing multiple interpretation of legal knowledge-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Formalizing multiple interpretation of legal knowledge

Published:1995 Issue:4 Volume:3 Page:221-265
ISSN:0924-8463
Container-title:Artificial Intelligence and Law
language:en
Short-container-title:Artif Intell Law

Author:

Hamfelt Andreas

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Artificial Intelligence

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00871851.pdf

Reference36 articles.

1. Allen, L. E. & Saxon S. S. 1991. More IA Needed in AI: Interpretation Assistance for Coping with the Problem of Multiple Structural Interpretations. In Proceedings ofThe Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 53?61, Oxford: Association of Computing Machinery.

2. Aristotle 1982.Nicomachean Ethics. transl. H. Rackham, Loeb Classical Library 73, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

3. Ashley, K. D. 1990.Modeling Legal Argument. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

4. Ashley, K. D. & Rissland, E. L. 1985. Toward Modelling Legal Argument. In Pre-Proceedings ofThe Second International Congress, on Logic, Informatics, and Law, 97?106. Florence.

5. Barklund, J. & Hamfelt, A. 1993. Formalising Multiple Interpretations of Law as Metalogic Programs,J. Law, Computer & Artificial Intelligence 2: 165?193.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law;Artificial Intelligence and Law;2010-06

2. Query Expansion for the Legal Domain: A Case Study from the JUMAS Project;Ontology, Conceptualization and Epistemology for Information Systems, Software Engineering and Service Science;2010

3. The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey;Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond;2002