Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law

Published:2010-06 Issue:2 Volume:18 Page:153-174
ISSN:0924-8463
Container-title:Artificial Intelligence and Law
language:en
Short-container-title:Artif Intell Law

Author:

Bench-Capon Trevor,Prakken Henry

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Artificial Intelligence

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10506-010-9094-8.pdf

Reference26 articles.

1. Amgoud L, Bodenstaff L, Caminada M, McBurney P, Parsons S, Prakken H, van Veenen J, Vreeswijk G (2006) Final review and report on formal argumentation system. Deliverable D2.6, ASPIC IST-FP6-002307

2. Ashley K (2008) A process model of legal argument with hypotheticals. In: Francesconi E, Sartor G, Tiscornia (eds) Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2008: the twentyfirst annual conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 1–10

3. Bench-Capon T (1991) Knowledge based systems applied to law: a framework for discussion. In: Bench-Capon T (eds) Knowledge based systems and legal applications. Academic Press, London, pp 329–342

4. Bench-Capon T (2009) Towards computational modelling of Supreme Court opinions: Furman v Georgia. In: Atkinson K (eds) Modelling legal cases. Vol. 5 of IDT Series. Huygens Editorial, Barcelona, pp 63–75

5. Bench-Capon T, Prakken H (2009) A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases. In: Governatori G (eds) Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2009: the twenty-second annual conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 11–20

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Modelling Value-Oriented Legal Reasoning in LogiKEy;Logics;2024-03-14

2. Confronting value-based argumentation frameworks with people’s assessment of argument strength;Argument & Computation;2023-11-07

3. Whatever Happened to Hypotheticals?;Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-06-19

4. Finding the right voice(s): An engagement analysis of L2 writers in hypothetical legal writing;Linguistics and Education;2023-02

5. Argument Schemes for Factor Ascription;Computational Models of Argument;2022-09-07