Affiliation:
1. Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK
Abstract
Reasoning with legal cases by balancing factors (reasons to decide for and against the disputing parties) is a two stage process: first the factors must be ascribed and then these reasons for and against weighed to reach a decision. While the task of determining which set of reasons is stronger has received much attention, the task of factor ascription has not. Here we present a set of argument schemes for factor ascription, illustrated with a detailed example.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Toward representing interpretation in factor-based models of precedent;Artificial Intelligence and Law;2024-01-12
2. A Note on Hierarchical Constraints;Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications;2023-12-07
3. Whatever Happened to Hypotheticals?;Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-06-19
4. Justification, stability and relevance for case-based reasoning with incomplete focus cases;Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-06-19
5. ANGELIC II;Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-06-19