Author:
Amelung Nina,Granja Rafaela,Machado Helena
Abstract
Abstract
The UK is the possessor of the world’s oldest and largest DNA database by proportion of population: the National Criminal Intelligence DNA Database, established in 1995. As a nation-state that holds one of the world’s largest DNA databases, the UK has been dealing systematically with the societal effects triggered by various ethical controversies. In terms of bordering practices, the UK serves as an example of an ambivalent mode of re- and debordering. This ambivalence derives from the UK’s changing position regarding the Prüm system. In 2014, the UK government, driven by the parliament, decided to opt out of the Prüm Decisions. In 2015, after a Prüm-style pilot project run with other EU Member States, the UK decided to opt in. This decision, nonetheless, included the imposition of limits on other EU countries’ access to the UK’s data. Consequently, the UK’s debordering practices co-exist with rebordering attempts aimed at restricting access to their own data.
Reference33 articles.
1. Amankwaa, A. O. (2018). Forensic DNA retention: Public perspective studies in the United Kingdom and around the world. Science & Justice, 58(6), 455–464.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2018.05.002
2. Amankwaa, A. O., & McCartney, C. (2018). The UK national DNA database: Implementation of the protection of freedoms act 2012. Forensic Science International, 284, 117–128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.041
3. Amelung, N., & Machado, H. (2019). Affected for good or for evil: The formation of issue-publics that relate to the UK National DNA Database. Public Understanding of Science, 28(5), 590–605.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519836346
4. Anderson, C., Stackhouse, R. S., Shaw, A., & Iredale, R. (2011). The national DNA database on trial: Engaging young people in South Wales with genetics. Public Understanding of Science, 20(2), 146–162.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510375793
5. Brunsden, J., & Peel, M. (2020, February 2). EU to pressure post-Brexit Britain over DNA sharing. Financial Times. Retrieved June 23, 2020, from
https://www.ft.com/content/87e841f4-4406-11ea-a43a-c4b328d9061c
.