Author:
Yoshioka Takashi, ,Ikenoue Tatsuyoshi,Hashimoto Hideaki,Otsuki Hideo,Oeda Tadashi,Ishito Noritaka,Watanabe Ryuta,Saika Takashi,Araki Motoo,Fukuhara Shunichi,Yamamoto Yosuke
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To develop and validate a new clinical prediction model that accurately predicts the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) using information obtained from non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT).
Methods
This multicentre retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled patients diagnosed with upper urinary tract calculi by NCCT at five hospitals in Japan from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2016. Among the candidate predictors, we selected the six most significant predictors a priori. The main outcome was SWL failure after three sessions. Model calibration was evaluated by the calibration slope and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Discrimination was evaluated by the receiver-operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed; based on the estimated β coefficients, predictive scores were generated.
Results
Of 2695 patients, 2271 were included. Patients were divided into the development cohort (1666 patients) and validation cohort (605 patients) according to geographical factors. We developed a clinical prediction model with scores ranging from 0 to 49 points. We named the prediction model the S3HoCKwave score based on the initials of the predictors (sex, skin-to-stone distance, size, Hounsfield units, colic, and kidney or ureter). As a result of internal validation, the optimism-corrected AUC was 0.72. In the validation cohort, the Hosmer–Lemeshow test did not show statistical significance (P = 0.33), and the AUC was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.65–0.76).
Conclusions
The S3HoCKwave score is easy to understand, has a relatively high predictive value, and allows clinicians to make appropriate treatment selections.
Funder
The Japanese Society of Urolithiasis Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12:e86–96
2. Sakamoto S, Miyazawa K, Yasui T et al (2018) Chronological changes in the epidemiological characteristics of upper urinary tract urolithiasis in Japan. Int J Urol 25:373–378
3. Alelign T, Petros B (2018) Kidney stone disease: an update on current concepts. Adv Urol 2018:3068365
4. Kum F, Mahmalji W, Hale J, Thomas K, Bultitude M, Glass J (2016) Do stones still kill? An analysis of death from stone disease 1999–2013 in England and Wales. BJU Int 118:140–144
5. Japanese Urological Association, Japanese Society of Endourology, Japanese Society of Urolithiasis Research (2013) Japanese guideline on urolithiasis, 2nd edn. https://minds.jcqhc.or.jp/n/med/4/med0022/G0000634/0021. Accessed 27 Aug 2019