Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Age is known to have an impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, age differences can be investigated from a cross-sectional as well as from a longitudinal perspective. This study combines both perspectives.
Materials and methods
LAP-01 is the first multicenter randomized patient blinded trial comparing outcomes after robotic-assisted and laparoscopic RP. This study stratified the entire population that received nerve-sparing surgery and was potent at baseline by the following ages: ≤ 60 years, 61–65 years, and > 65 years. Potency was assessed using the IIEF-5. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used for global health perception and the EORTC QLQ-PR25 for urinary symptoms. Continence was assessed by the number of pads used. Longitudinal change was assessed using either validated anchor-based criteria or the 1 or 0.5-standard-deviation criterion. Worsening of continence was measured by increasing numbers of pads.
Results
310 patients were included into this study. Older patients had a significantly higher risk for worsening of continence at 3 and 6 months (OR 2.21, 95% CI [1.22, 4.02], p = 0.009 and OR 2.00, 95% CI [1.16, 3.46], p = 0.013, respectively); at 12 months, the odds of worsening did not differ significantly between age groups. Potency scores were better in younger patients from a cross-sectional perspective, but longitudinal change did not differ between the age groups. In contrast, global health perception was better in older patients from a cross-sectional perspective and longitudinal decreases were significantly more common among the youngest patients, at 12 months (36.9% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.038).
Conclusion
From a cross-sectional perspective, function scores were better in younger patients, but from a longitudinal perspective, age differences were found in continence only. In contrast, global health scores were better in older patients from a cross-sectional and longitudinal perspective.
Trial registration
The LAP-01 trial was registered with the U.S. National Library of Medicine clinical trial registry (clinicaltrials.gov), NCT number: NCT03682146, and with the German Clinical Trial registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), DRKS ID number: DRKS00007138.
Funder
Deutsche Krebshilfe
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference20 articles.
1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210
2. Barnes B (ed) (2016) Bericht zum Krebsgeschehen in Deutschland 2016. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin
3. Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh R. EAU - EANM - ESTRO - ESUR - SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. 2020. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG-Guidelines-on-Prostate-Cancer-2020v4.pdf. Accessed 8 Mar 2021.
4. Rogers CG, Su L-M, Link RE, Sullivan W, Wagner A, Pavlovich CP (2006) Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 176:2448–2452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.153
5. Kumar A, Samavedi S, Bates AS, Giedelman Cuevas CA, Coelho RF, Rocco B et al (2015) Age stratified comparative analysis of perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients after robot assisted radical prostatectomy—a propensity score matched study. European J Surg Oncol 41:837–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.006
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献