Abstract
AbstractThe field of bio-inspired geotechnics has been growing in response to the demand for foundations that are sustainable and yet have improved load-bearing capacities. This study aims to address the gap in a specialised adaptation of root system architecture for designing resilient foundations. The lateral load behaviour of one such novel grouped battered minipile configuration is evaluated in this study based on full-scale field testing and numerical modelling to report the unknown increase of load capacity caused by shape modification. First, three single minipiles battered at 0° and 25° were subjected to static lateral loading in fine-grained soil. The strain profiles along the individual minipile shafts were obtained using optic fibre sensors. Consecutively, full-scale lateral load tests on two types of minipile groups were also performed; one group had a configuration of two 25° battered minipiles perpendicular to the direction of loading mimicking a tree-root system, and another conventional group had two positive and negative battered minipiles. A numerical model was developed to investigate the effect of pile spacing and obtain soil pressures, bending moments and axial forces of the battered minipile groups. Results show that increased bearing area and higher engagement of soil volume for the novel minipile group with two perpendicular battered minipiles were larger than the conventional minipile group; thus, the former offered higher lateral resistance. The deflection pattern, bending moment and p-y curves showed a shadowing effect in stiff clay for battered minipile groups at a pile head spacing of three times the minipile diameter.
Funder
Australian Research Council
University of Melbourne
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference63 articles.
1. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications (2012) American association of state highway transportation officials, Washington, DC
2. Abd Elaziz AY, El Naggar MH (2015) Performance of hollow bar micropiles under monotonic and cyclic lateral loads. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(5):04015010
3. Abu-Farsakh M, Souri A, Voyiadjis G, Rosti F (2018) Comparison of static lateral behavior of three pile group configurations using three-dimensional finite element modeling. Can Geotech J 55(1):107–118. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0077
4. Achmus M, Kuo Y-S, Abdel-Rahman K (2009) Behavior of monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load. Comput Geotech 36(5):725–735
5. AS 1289.6.3.2 (1997) Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes—method 6.3.2: soil strength and consolidation tests-determination of the penetration resistance of a soil-9kg dynamic cone penetrometer test, Australian Standard, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献