Visual and instrumental coverage error of two dental shade guides: an in vivo study

Author:

Ruiz-López Javier,Perez Maria M.,Lucena Cristina,Pulgar Rosa,López-Toruño Ana,Tejada-Casado Maria,Ghinea Razvan

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study aims to evaluate in vivo the color agreement between natural teeth and dental shade guides by means of visual and instrumental coverage error ($$\mathrm{CE}$$ CE ) index. Materials and methods The color of the middle third of 735 incisors was visually determined by two evaluators using the Vita Classical (VC) and Vita 3D Master (V3DM) shade guides. The color match between the natural tooth and the shade tab was rated as poor (P), good (G), or optimum (O) by each observer. CIE color coordinates of the target teeth and shade tabs of VC and V3DM were instrumentally measured using a clinical spectrophotometer. Visual ($${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{V}}$$ CE V ) and instrumental ($${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{I}}$$ CE I ) coverage error indexes were computed using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 metrics for both shade guides. For $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{V}}$$ CE V calculation, only the concordant inter-observer determination on tooth shade rated as O–O or O–G was used. The results were evaluated using perceptibility (PT, $${\mathrm{\Delta E}}_{\mathrm{ab}}^{*}$$ Δ E ab = 1.2, $${\mathrm{\Delta E}}_{00}$$ Δ E 00 = 0.8) and acceptability (AT, $${\mathrm{\Delta E}}_{\mathrm{ab}}^{*}$$ Δ E ab = 2.7, $${\mathrm{\Delta E}}_{00}$$ Δ E 00 = 1.8) color thresholds for dentistry. Results VC and V3DM exhibited $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{I}}$$ CE I (2.5, 3.2, and 3.2, 2.7 CIELAB units; 1.9, 2.3, and 2.8, 2.4 CIEDE2000 units, respectively, for O–O and O–G match) and $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{V}}$$ CE V (4.7, 4.8, and 4.1, 4.6 CIELAB units; 3.3, 3.4, and 3.4, 3.6 CIEDE2000 units, respectively, for O–O and O–G match) values greater than 50:50% AT for both color difference formulas. $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{I}}$$ CE I contributes more than 50% (53.2–82.4% range) to the $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{V}}$$ CE V value. This contribution depends on the shade guide used and the quality of the visual rating. Conclusions The evaluated shade guides exhibited visual coverage errors above acceptability thresholds, largely due to the contribution of the instrumental coverage error to the visual coverage error. Clinical relevance It necessary to further improve commercially available dental shade guides to facilitate achievement of satisfactory esthetics results in clinical practice.

Funder

Junta de Andalucía

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades

Universidad de Granada

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3