Nāgārjuna's appeal-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Nāgārjuna's appeal

Published:1994-12 Issue:4 Volume:22 Page:299-378
ISSN:0022-1791
Container-title:Journal of Indian Philosophy
language:en
Short-container-title:J Indian Philos

Author:

Hayes Richard P.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy,Cultural Studies

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF01095223.pdf

Reference49 articles.

1. Abrams, M. H. 1988a. The deconstructive angel.Pages 265–276of: Lodge, David (ed),Modern criticism and theory: A reader. London and New York: Longman.

2. Abrams, M. H. 1988b.A glossary of literary terms. Fifth edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

3. Bechert, Heinz. 1973. Notes on the formation of Buddhist sects and the origins of the Mahāyāna.Pages 6–18of:German scholars on India, vol. 1 Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.

4. Bhattacharya, Kamaleswar. 1984. La signification du madhyamaka: Reconsidération des arguments de Nāgārjuna contre le mouvement.Chap. Mexico, pages 189–199 of: memoria del Primer Simposio Internacional de Lengua Sánscrita: (ed),Cultura sánscrita: memoria del Primer Simposio Interacional de Lengua Sánscrita. Mexico.

5. Bhattacharya, Kamaleswar. 1985. Nāgārjuna's arguments against motion.Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 8(1), 7–16.

Cited by 38 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Philosopher Returns to Saṃsāra;Crossing the Stream, Leaving the Cave;2024-05-07

2. Unity and Predication in Plato’s Parmenides and Nāgārjuna’s Root Verses;Crossing the Stream, Leaving the Cave;2024-05-07

3. Analysis of the Ontological Contexts of Comparing Nāgārjuna’s Arguments against Motion with Zeno’s Paradoxes and the Hermeneutic Importance of Tsongkhapa’s Ocean of Arguments;Voprosy Filosofii;2022

4. The Madhyamaka Contribution to Skepticism;International Journal for the Study of Skepticism;2021-12-23

5. Nāgārjuna;The Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Religion;2021-11-16