A Mixed-Methods Study on Topical Fluoride Beliefs and Refusal Behaviors for Caregivers of Children with Special Health Care Needs
-
Published:2023-11-15
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1092-7875
-
Container-title:Maternal and Child Health Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Matern Child Health J
Author:
Koh MadelynORCID, Kerr Darragh, Hill Courtney M., Chi Donald L.
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To understand topical fluoride-related beliefs and refusal behaviors for caregivers of children with special health care needs (CSHCN).
Methods
This was an explanatory sequential mixed methods study. For the quantitative analyses, we surveyed 520 caregivers to (a) compare fluoride-related beliefs between caregivers of CSHCN and caregivers of healthy children and (b) evaluate the association between special health care need (SHCN) status and topical fluoride refusal. We used logistic regression models to generate unadjusted odds ratios, confounder-adjusted odds ratios (AOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). For the qualitative analyses, we interviewed 56 caregivers who refused or were hesitant about topical fluoride. Data were coded deductively and compared by SHCN status to an existing conceptual model of topical fluoride refusal.
Results
In the quantitative analysis, 41.3% of caregivers refused or thought about refusing topical fluoride. There were no significant differences in fluoride beliefs by SHCN status (p-values > 0.05) nor was there a significant association between SHCN status and topical fluoride refusal (AOR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.37–1.14; p = 0.13). In the qualitative analysis, the relative importance of each domain of the conceptual model was similar between the caregiver groups. Two differences were that all caregivers of CSHCN thought fluoride was unnecessary and wanted to keep chemicals out of their child’s body.
Conclusions for Practice
While caregivers of CSHCN were not more likely to refuse topical fluoride than caregivers of healthy children, there may be important differences in the underlying reasons for refusing topical fluoride.
Funder
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research University of Washington Dr. Douglass L. Morell Dentistry Research Fund Lloyd and Kay Chapman Endowed Chair for Oral Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health,Epidemiology
Reference38 articles.
1. Abu Kuwaik, G., Roberts, W., Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., Smith, I. M., Szatmari, P., Modi, B. M., Tanel, N., & Brian, J. (2014). Immunization uptake in younger siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism: the International Journal of Research and Practice, 18(2), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361312459111 2. Bagattoni, S., Lardani, L., D’Alessandro, G., & Piana, G. (2021). Oral health status of Italian children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 22(3), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2021.22.03.12 3. Campanaro, M., Huebner, C. E., & Davis, B. E. (2014). Facilitators and barriers to twice daily tooth brushing among children with special health care needs. Special Care in Dentistry, 34(4), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12057 4. Capozza, L. E., & Bimstein, E. (2012). Preferences of parents of children with autism spectrum disorders concerning oral health and dental treatment. Pediatric Dentistry, 34(7), 480–484. 5. Carle, A., Kerr, D., Edwards, T., Carpiano, R. M., Patiño Nguyen, D. P., Shands, M. E., Chi, D. L. (2022). Developing and validating a measure of caregiver topical fluoride hesitancy. In 2022 CityMatCH Leadership and MCH Epidemiology Conference.
|
|