Abstract
Abstract
Background
Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the major complications associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM or CD166) is a promising urine biomarker that binds to CD6, a receptor found on lymphocytes. This binding results in T-cell activation, proliferation, and recruitment, which causes tissue inflammation and may explain the pathophysiology of LN.
Aim of work
Investigate the urinary ALCAM level in SLE, study its relationship to disease activity, and clarify the association with LN activity and histopathology.
Patients and methods
A case–control study was performed on 60 patients with SLE and 20 matched controls. The SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and the activity of renal disease (rSLEDAI) were evaluated. Renal biopsy and uALCAM levels were also investigated.
Results
Urinary ALCAM levels were higher significantly in active LN patients than inactive LN patients, active and inactive non-LN SLE, and the control group (p < 0.001). The cut-off value for identifying active and inactive LN was above 270 ng/mg (p < 0.001). ALCAM levels were greater in proliferative (class III, IV, and IV/V) than in non-proliferative (class II and V) LN (p < 0.001). ALCAM exhibited high positive correlations with SLEDAI and rSLEDAI (p < 0.001 each) and negative significant correlations with C3 (p < 0.001) and C4 (p = 0.005).
Conclusion
Urinary ALCAM is a sensitive biomarker evaluating LN in SLE patients. Levels above 270 ng/mg can help distinguish between active and inactive LN. ALCAM levels are correlated positively with SLEDAI and rSLEDAI but have a negative correlation with C3 and C4.
Key Points• Urinary ALCAM shows promise as a biomarker for evaluating kidney dysfunction in SLE patients.• It is a non-invasive marker that can differentiate between proliferative and non-proliferative LN.• A urinary ALCAM level above 270 ng/mg can indicate active LN, while lower levels indicate inactive LN.• Urinary ALCAM levels are correlated positively with SLEDAI and rSLEDAI scores but correlated negatively with C3 and C4.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Guo X, Yang X, Li Q, Shen X et al (2021) The microbiota in systemic lupus erythematosus: An update on the potential function of probiotics. Front Pharmacol 12(9759095):1–12
2. Renaudineau Y, Brooks W, Belliere J (2023) Lupus nephritis risk factors and biomarkers: An update. Int J Mol Sci 24(19):14526-14545
3. So BYF, Yap DYH, Chan TM (2021) MicroRNAs in lupus nephritis-role in disease pathogenesis and clinical applications. Int J Mol Sci 4 22(19):37-60
4. Mosaad GM, Abdel Moneam SM, Soliman A, Ameen SG, Amer AS (2022) Implication of plasma gelsolin in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43166-021-00103-z
5. ZhangT DV, Vanarsa K, Mohan C (2020) Targeted urine proteomics in lupus nephritis—A meta-analysis. Expert Rev Proteom 17(10):767–776
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献