Affirming the Existence and Legitimacy of Secular Bioethical Consensus, and Rejecting Engelhardt’s Alternative: A Reply to Nick Colgrove and Kelly Kate Evans-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Affirming the Existence and Legitimacy of Secular Bioethical Consensus, and Rejecting Engelhardt’s Alternative: A Reply to Nick Colgrove and Kelly Kate Evans

Published:2021-06-22 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0956-2737
Container-title:HEC Forum
language:en
Short-container-title:HEC Forum

Author:

Brummett Abram^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health(social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10730-021-09452-w.pdf

Reference51 articles.

1. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2011). Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation. Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

2. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2015). Improving competencies in clinical ethics consultation: An education guide (2nd ed.). Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

3. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2017). Addressing patient-centered ethical issues in health care: A case-based study guide. Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

4. Appelbaum, P. S. (2007). Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(18), 1834–1840.

5. Arras, J. (2016). Theory and bioethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [Online] Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/theory-bioethics/.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “We are not the ethics police”: The professionalization of clinical ethicists and the regulation of medical decision-making;Social Science & Medicine;2023-04

2. The many metaphysical commitments of secular clinical ethics: Expanding the argument for a moral–metaphysical proceduralism;Bioethics;2022-05-09

3. Defending secular clinical ethics expertise from an Engelhardt-inspired sense of theoretical crisis;Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics;2022-02