Defending secular clinical ethics expertise from an Engelhardt-inspired sense of theoretical crisis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Defending secular clinical ethics expertise from an Engelhardt-inspired sense of theoretical crisis

Published:2022-02 Issue:1 Volume:43 Page:47-66
ISSN:1386-7415
Container-title:Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Theor Med Bioeth

Author:

Brummett Abram

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11017-022-09566-3.pdf

Reference76 articles.

1. Pellegrino, Edmund D. 2000. Bioethics at century’s turn: Can normative ethics be retrieved? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25: 655–675.

2. Brummett, Abram, and Erika K. Salter. 2019. Taxonomizing views of clinical ethics expertise. American Journal of Bioethics 19(11): 50–61.

3. Engelhardt, H. Tristram, Jr. 2012. A skeptical reassessment of bioethics. In Bioethics critically reconsidered: Having second thoughts, ed. H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr., 1–29. Dordrecht: Springer.

4. Healthcare Ethics Consultation Certification Committee. 2018. HEC-C examination content outline. https://heccertification.org/images/PDFs/HEC-C_Content_Outline_and_Core_References.pdf.

5. Watson, Jamie Carlin, and Laura K. Guidry-Grimes (eds.). 2018. Moral expertise: New essays from theoretical and clinical bioethics. Cham: Springer.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Reasonable Content of Conscience in Public Bioethics;Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;2024-03-12

2. A Reply: Conversation, Not Compulsion;The Linacre Quarterly;2024-01-30