Abstract
Abstract
Within the nutritionism paradigm, in this article we critically review the marketization and medicalization logics which aim to address the pressing issue of malnutrition in low- and middle-income countries. Drawing from political economy and food system transformation discourses, we are using the popular intervention types of nutrition-sensitive value chains (marketization logic) and biofortification exemplified through orange-fleshed sweet potato (medicalization logic) to assess their outcomes and underlying logics. We demonstrate that there is insufficient evidence of the positive impact of these interventions on nutritional outcomes, and that their underlying theories of change and impact logics do not deal with the inherent complexity of nutritional challenges. We show that nutrition-sensitive value chain approaches are unable to leverage or enhance the functioning of value chains to improve nutritional outcomes, especially in light of the disproportionate power of some food companies. We further demonstrate that orange-fleshed sweet potato interventions and biofortification more broadly adopt a narrow approach to malnutrition, disregarding the interactions between food components and broader value chain and food system dynamics. We argue that both intervention types focus solely on increasing the intake of specific nutrients without incorporating their embeddedness in the wider food systems and the relevant political-economic and social relations that influence the production and consumption of food. We conclude that the systemic nature of malnutrition requires to be understood and addressed as part of the food system transformation challenge in order to move towards solving it. To do so, new evaluation frameworks along with new approaches to solutions are necessary that support multiple and diverse development pathways, which are able to acknowledge the social, political-economic, and environmental factors and drivers of malnutrition and poverty.
Funder
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Development,Food Science
Reference116 articles.
1. Adekambi, S. A., Okello, J. J., Low, J. W., Abidin, P. E., & Carey, E. (2022). Does vitamin A rich orange-fleshed sweetpotato adoption improve household level diet diversity? Evidence from Ghana and Nigeria. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.2015172
2. Allen, S., & de Brauw, A. (2018). Nutrition sensitive value chains: Theory, progress, and open questions. Global Food Security, 16, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.07.002
3. Anderson, M., & Leach, M. (2019). Transforming food systems: The potential of engaged political economy. IDS Bulletin, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2019.123
4. Anderson, C. R., & Maughan, C. (2021). “The Innovation Imperative”: The Struggle Over Agroecology in the International Food Policy Arena. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.619185
5. Anim-Somuah, H., Henson, S., Humphrey, J., & Robinson, E. (2013). Strengthening Agri-Food Value Chains for Nutrition: Mapping Value Chains for Nutrient-Dense Foods in Ghana (Evidence Report No. 2: Reducing Hunder and Undernutrition). Institute of Development Studies (IDS). Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/2632
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献