Author:
Saeed Omar,Székács András,Jordán Győző,Mörtl Mária,Abukhadra Mostafa R.,Eid Mohamed Hamdy
Abstract
AbstractThis study aimed to determine the environmental and health risks of the heavy metal levels in the Danube River in Hungary. The metals, including Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Ni, Cr, Pb, and As, were measured in the period from 2013 to 2019. The Spearman correlation and heatmap cluster analysis were utilized to determine the origin of pollution and the factors that control surface water quality. Several indices, such as the heavy metal pollution index (HPI), metal index (MI), hazard quotient oral and dermal (HQ), hazard index oral and dermal (HI), and carcinogenic risk (CR), were conducted to evaluate the potential risks for the environment and human health. The values of the HPI were between the range of 15 < HPI < 30, which indicated moderate pollution; however, the MI results showed high pollution in Dunaföldvár and Hercegszántó cities. The ecological risk (RI < 30) and HI values (< 1) showed low environmental risks and non-carcinogenic impacts of the existing metals, either on adults or children. The mean CR value of oral arsenic was 2.2E−04 and 2.5E−04 during April–September and October–March, respectively, indicating that children were the most vulnerable to arsenic-carcinogenic oral effects. While lead’s CR oral values for children during April–September exceeded the threshold of 1.0E−04, chromium’s oral and dermal CR values for both adults and children were 2.08E−04, 6.11E−04, 1.97E−04, and 5.82E−04 during April–September and October–March, respectively. These results demonstrate the potential carcinogenic risks related to chromium exposure within the two pathways in Hungary and highlight the need for effective measures to mitigate these risks.
Funder
Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,General Environmental Science,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Chemistry,General Medicine,Environmental Engineering
Reference73 articles.
1. Al-Hejuje, M. M., Hussain, N. A., & Al-Saad, H. T. (2017). Applied heavy metals pollution index (hpi) as a water pollution indicator of Shatt Al-Arab River, Basrah-Iraq. International Journal of Marine Science, 7, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.5376/IJMS.2017.07.0035
2. Ali, M. M., Ali, M. L., Islam, M. S., & Rahman, M. Z. (2016). Preliminary assessment of heavy metals in water and sediment of Karnaphuli River, Bangladesh. Environment Nanotechnology Monitoring & Management, 5, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENMM.2016.01.002
3. Bineshpour, M., Payandeh, K., Nazarpour, A., & Sabzalipour, S. (2021). Status, source, human health risk assessment of potential toxic elements (PTEs), and Pb isotope characteristics in urban surface soil, case study: Arak city Iran. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 43, 4939–4958. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10653-020-00778-X
4. Burada, A., Ţopa, C. M., Georgescu, L. P., Teodorof, L., Năstase, C., Seceleanu-Odor, D., et al. (2014). AACL BIOFLUX Heavy metals accumulation in plankton and water of four aquatic complexes from Danube Delta area 1,2, 7(4). http://www.bioflux.com.ro/aacl. Accessed 15 Feb 2023
5. Calmuc, M., Calmuc, V., Arseni, M., et al. (2020). A comparative approach to a series of physico-chemical quality indices used in assessing water quality in the lower danube. Water, 12, 3239. https://doi.org/10.3390/W12113239