Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Computational text mining methods are proposed as a useful methodological innovation in Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) research. Text mining can offer researchers access to existing or new datasets, sourced from social media or from IPV-related organisations, that would be too large to analyse manually. This article aims to give an overview of current work applying text mining methodologies in the study of IPV, as a starting point for researchers wanting to use such methods in their own work.
Methods
This article reports the results of a systematic review of academic research using computational text mining to research IPV. A review protocol was developed according to PRISMA guidelines, and a literature search of 8 databases was conducted, identifying 22 unique studies that were included in the review.
Results
The included studies cover a wide range of methodologies and outcomes. Supervised and unsupervised approaches are represented, including rule-based classification (n = 3), traditional Machine Learning (n = 8), Deep Learning (n = 6) and topic modelling (n = 4) methods. Datasets are mostly sourced from social media (n = 15), with other data being sourced from police forces (n = 3), health or social care providers (n = 3), or litigation texts (n = 1). Evaluation methods mostly used a held-out, labelled test set, or k-fold Cross Validation, with Accuracy and F1 metrics reported. Only a few studies commented on the ethics of computational IPV research.
Conclusions
Text mining methodologies offer promising data collection and analysis techniques for IPV research. Future work in this space must consider ethical implications of computational approaches.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Centre for Doctoral Training in Cybersecurity
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology
Reference80 articles.
1. *Adily, A., Karystianis, G., & Butler, T. (2021). Text mining police narratives to identify types of abuse and victim injuries in family and domestic violence events. Trends And Issues In Crime And Criminal Justice (630), 1-12.
2. Alhabib, S., Nur, U., & Jones, R. (2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of Family Violence, 25(4), 369–382.
3. *Allen, K., Davis, A. L., & Krishnamurti, T. (2021). Indirect Identification of Perinatal Psychosocial Risks from Natural Language. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.
4. Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning: MIT press.
5. Arango, A., Pérez, J., & Poblete, B. (2019). Hate Speech Detection is Not as Easy as You May Think: A Closer Look at Model Validation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Paris, France. . https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331262
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献