Asking the Right Questions? A Critical Overview of Longitudinal Survey Data on Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse Among Adults and Young People in the UK

Author:

Skafida ValeriaORCID,Feder Gene,Barter Christine

Abstract

AbstractPurposeWe undertake a critical analysis of UK longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional population surveys which ask about experiences of intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA).MethodSeven relevant UK representative population-based surveys which ask about IPVA among adults and/or young people (16–17 years old) were identified. We critically engage with the questionnaires to analyse the strengths and limitations of existing UK data on IPVA.ResultsSeveral limitations in UK surveys are identified. Many questions still show a bias, partly historical, towards collecting more data about physical abuse. Few surveys ask about financial abuse, abuse post-separation or through child contact, or through technologies, though improvements are under way. Surveys still seek to count incidents of abuse, instead of enquiring about the impact of abusive behaviours on victims. Ethnicity and other demographic variables are not always adequately captured (or accessible to data users), making it difficult to explore aspects of inequality. Potentially useful comparisons within the UK are difficult to undertake given the increasingly divergent questionnaires used in different UK nations.ConclusionsWe discuss how future iterations of existing surveys or new surveys can improve with regards to how questions about IPVA are asked. Given that surveys across geographical contexts often suffer similar weaknesses, our findings will be relevant for IPVA survey methodology beyond the UK context.

Funder

Nuffield Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology

Reference72 articles.

1. Bagwell-Gray, M. E., Messing, J. T., & Baldwin-White, A. (2015). Intimate partner sexual violence: A review of terms, definitions, and prevalence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014557290

2. Bailey, B. (2010). Partner violence during pregnancy: Prevalence, effects, screening, and management. International Journal of Women’s Health, 183. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S8632

3. Barter, C., McCarry, M., & Berridge, D. (2009). Partner exploitation and violence in teenage intimate relationships. Research report. NSPCC. https://equation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Partner-Exploitation-and-Violence-in-Teenage-Intimate-Relationships.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2022

4. Barter, C., & Koulu, S. (2021). Digital technologies and gender-based violence – mechanisms for oppression, activism and recovery. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 5(3), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16315286472556

5. Barter, C. (2014). Researching young people’s experiences of intimate partner violence: Concepts, contexts and consequences. In Understanding Gender Based Violence, National and International Contexts (pp. 33–49). Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3