The Concept and Measurement of Interpersonal Violence in Specialist Services Data: Inconsistencies, Outcomes and the Challenges of Synthesising Evidence

Author:

Bunce Annie1ORCID,Carlisle Sophie2,Capelas Barbosa Estela1

Affiliation:

1. Violence and Society Centre, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK

2. Department of Health Service and Population Research, David Goldberg Centre, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK

Abstract

Interpersonal violence comprises a variety of different types of violence that occur between individuals, including violence perpetrated by strangers and acquaintances, intimate partners and family members. Interpersonal violence is a leading cause of death, particularly among young adults. Inconsistencies in definitions and approaches to the measurement of interpersonal violence mean it is difficult to clearly understand its prevalence and the differences and similarities between its different subcategories and contexts. In the UK, specialist services provide support for victim-survivors and also perpetrators of violence. As well as delivering frontline services, specialist services collect data on interpersonal violence, both routinely and for the purpose of research and evaluation. This data has the potential to greatly improve understanding of violence in the UK; however, several issues make this challenging. This review describes and discusses some of the key challenges facing the two types of data collected by specialist services. Key inconsistencies regarding conceptualisation and measurement are identified, along with the implications of these for the synthesis of data, including implications for researchers, service providers, funders and commissioners. Recommendations are proposed to improve practice, the quality of data and, therefore, the understanding of interpersonal violence in the UK.

Funder

UK Prevention Research Partnership

British Heart Foundation

Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Economic and Social Research Council

Health and Social Care Research and Development Division

Medical Research Council

National Institute for Health Research

Natural Environment Research Council

Public Health Agency

The Health Foundation

Wellcome

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference78 articles.

1. Advance (2021). Annual Report and Accounts 2021, Advance. Available online: https://www.advancecharity.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Advance-Annual-Report-2021.pdf.

2. ASEAN (2018). ASEAN Regional Guidelines on Violence against Women and Girls Data Collection and Use, United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. Available online: https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Field%20Office%20ESEAsia/Docs/Publications/2018/04/ASEAN-VAWG-Data-Guidelines.pdf.

3. Beck, Aaron T., Steer, Robert A., and Brown, Gregory K. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

4. Women on the Move: Administrative Data as a Safe Way to Research Hidden Domestic Violence Journeys;Bowstead;Journal of Gender-Based Violence,2019

5. Women’s Responses to Battering Over Time: An Analysis of Change;Campbell;Journal of Interpersonal Violence,1999

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3