Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several studies suggest that deviations from proper authorship practices are commonplace in medicine. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of and attitudes towards the handling of authorship in PhD theses at medical faculties in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.
Methods
Those who defended their PhD thesis at a medical faculty in Scandinavia during the second half of 2020 were offered, by e-mail, to participate in an online survey. Survey questions dealt with experiences of violations of the first three of the ICMJE authorship criteria and misuse of authorship order in the thesis articles, as well as respondents’ attitudes to these matters. Both questions with fixed response alternatives and questions with free-text responses were used. Quantitative data were analysed statistically using the Table functions in SPSS 25 and Chi-2 tests. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively using manifest content analysis.
Results
287 valid questionnaires were returned (response rate: 34.1%). Almost half (46.0%) of the respondents reported that the ICMJE authorship criteria were not fully respected in at least one of the papers in their thesis, while a vast majority (96.7%) found it important that authorship is handled according to the ICMJE authorship criteria. 24.4% reported inadequate handling of authorship order in at least one paper. The qualitative results provide a wide spectrum of examples of how the ICMJE authorship criteria are circumvented.
Conclusion
Despite increasing educational efforts to reduce deviations from good research practice at Scandinavian universities, the handling of authorship in medical papers remains problematic.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education
Reference26 articles.
1. Al-Herz, W., Haider, H., Al-Bahhar, M., & Sadeq, A. (2014). Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist? Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(5), 346–348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101311.
2. ALLEA – All European Academies (2017). The European code of conduct for research integrity. Revised edition. Berlin: ALLEA.
3. Alshogran, O. Y., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2018). Understanding of International Committee of Medical Journal editors authorship criteria among faculty members of pharmacy and other health sciences in Jordan. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 276–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618764575.
4. Bredahl Jensen, L., Kyvik, O., Leth-Larsen, K., R., & Eriksen, B., M (2018). Research integrity among PhD students within clinical research at the University of Southern Denmark. Danish Medical Journal, 65(4), A5469.
5. Bülow, W., & Helgesson, G. (2018). Hostage authorship and the problem of dirty hands. Research Ethics, 14, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016118764305.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献