Abstract
Research integrity is of interest across disciplines, although reported on more frequently by health sciences researchers. This study investigated the experiences and attitudes of academic staff and postgraduate students to scientific misconduct in a South African health sciences institution. An anonymous self-administered, structured questionnaire conducted online was addressed to academic staff and postgraduate students. While the response rate was low (11.4%), it reflects the diversity of the health sciences institution. While fabricating, falsifying, plagiarizing, or presenting results in a misleading way was self-reported as low, 9% of staff reported knowing of cases where misleading results had been presented and approximately 10% of respondents had witnessed misconduct. Authorship misconduct was concerning, with more staff (35.2%) than students (8.8%) reporting unethical pressure regarding inclusion or ordering of authors (p<0.001). The incidence of data altering by staff, and of clinicians who were uncertain about reporting scientific misconduct although low, is disquieting. Institutions should ensure that adequate research integrity training is provided if the standard and veracity of its science is to be upheld.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference64 articles.
1. Scientific dishonesty: a survey of doctoral students at the major medical faculties in Sweden and Norway;Bjørn Hofmann;Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,2015
2. Research integrity among PhD students within clinical research at the University of Southern Denmark;L.B. Jensen;Dan Med J,2018
3. Singapore statement on research integrity;Gerard Nimal Lucas;Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health,2010
4. Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations;3rd World Conference on Research Integrity,2013
5. Research misconduct and publication ethics: a South African perspective;R Ballyram;South African Dental Journal,2019