Investigating the Interplay of Academic Dishonesty, Open Book Exams Perception, Preference, And Student Outcomes from The Self-Efficacy Theory Perspective-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Investigating the Interplay of Academic Dishonesty, Open Book Exams Perception, Preference, And Student Outcomes from The Self-Efficacy Theory Perspective

Published:2024-08-05 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1570-1727
Container-title:Journal of Academic Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:J Acad Ethics

Author:

Anthonysamy Lilian^ORCID,Singh Parmjit

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10805-024-09554-3.pdf

Reference86 articles.

1. Ackerman, R., & Leiser, D. (2014). The effect of concrete supplements on metacognitive regulation during learning and open-book test taking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12021

2. Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H. K., & McDermott, K. B. (2008). Examining the testing effect with open- and closed-book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1391

3. Amigud, A., & Lancaster, T. (2019). 246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students’ reasons for seeking to outsource academic work. Computers & Education, 134, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.017

4. Amzalag, M., Shapira, N., & Dolev, N. (2021). Two sides of the coin: Lack of academic integrity in exams during the corona pandemic, students’ and lecturers’ perceptions. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09413-5

5. Anaya, L., Evangelopoulos, N., & Lawani, U. (2010). Open-book vs. closed-book testing: An experimental comparison. American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved August 5, 2023, from https://strategy.asee.org/open-book-vs-closed-book-testing-an-experimental-comparison.pdf