Abstract
AbstractCollaborations are essential in research, especially in answering increasingly complex questions that require integrating knowledge from different disciplines and that engage multiple stakeholders. Fostering such collaboration between newcomers and established researchers helps keep scientific communities alive while opening the way to innovation. But this is a challenge for scientific communities, especially as little is known about the onset of such collaborations. Prior social network research suggests that face-to-face interaction at scientific events as well as both network-driven selection patterns (reciprocity and transitivity) and patterns of active selection of specific others (homophily / heterophily) may be important. Learning science research implies, moreover, that selecting appropriate collaboration partners may require group awareness. In a field study at two scientific events on technology-enhanced learning (Alpine Rendez-Vous 2011 and 2013) including N = 5736 relations between 287 researchers, we investigated how researchers selected future collaboration partners, looking specifically at the role of career level, disciplinary background, and selection patterns. Face-to-face contact was measured using RFID devices. Additionally, a group awareness intervention was experimentally varied. Data was analyzed using RSiena and meta-analyses. The results showed that transitivity, reciprocity and contact duration are relevant for the identification of new potential collaboration partners. PhD students were less often chosen as new potential collaboration partners, and researchers with a background in Information Technology selected fewer new potential collaboration partners. However, group awareness support balanced this disciplinary difference. Theoretical, methodological, and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Human-Computer Interaction,Education
Reference53 articles.
1. Aiello, L. M., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Ruffo, G., & Schifanella, R. (2010). Link Creation and Profile Alignment in the aNobii Social Network. In 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom) (pp. 249–256). https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2010.42
2. Alshareef, A. M., Alhamid, M. F., & El Saddik, A. (2018). Recommending Scientific Collaboration Based on Topical, Authors and Venues Similarities. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI). https://doi.org/10.1109/iri.2018.00016
3. Atzmueller, M., Doerfel, S., Hotho, A., Mitzlaff, F., & Stumme, G. (2012). Face-to-Face Contacts at a Conference: Dynamics of Communities and Roles. In M. Atzmueller, A. Chin, D. Helic, & A. Hotho (Eds.), Modeling and Mining Ubiquitous Social Media, 7472, 21–39. Springer.
4. Baerveldt, C., van de Bunt, G. G., & Federico de la Rua, AD. (2010). Why and how selection patterns in classroom networks differen between students: The potential influence of network size preferences, level of information, and group membership. REDES - Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 19(12), 273–298.
5. Bammer, G. (2013). Disciplining Interdisciplinarity: Integration and implementation sciences for researching complex real-world problems. ANU E Press.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献