Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence

Author:

Coeckelbergh MarkORCID

Abstract

AbstractDemocratic theories assume that citizens have some form of political knowledge in order to vote for representatives or to directly engage in democratic deliberation and participation. However, apart from widespread attention to the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation, less attention has been paid to how they are supposed to acquire that knowledge in contexts shaped by artificial intelligence and related digital technologies. While this topic can also be approached from an empirical angle, this paper contributes to supporting concerns about AI and democracy by looking at the issue through the lens of political epistemology, in particular using the concept of epistemic agency. It argues that artificial intelligence (AI) endangers democracy since it risks to diminish the epistemic agency of citizens and thereby undermine the relevant kind of political agency in democracy. It shows that next to fake news and manipulation by means of AI analysis of big data, epistemic bubbles and the defaulting of statistical knowledge endanger the epistemic agency of citizens when they form and wish to revise their political beliefs. AI risks to undermine trust in one’s own epistemic capacities and hinder the exercise of those capacities. If we want to protect the knowledge basis of our democracies, we must address these problems in education and technology policy.

Funder

University of Vienna

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference57 articles.

1. Anders, G.: On promethean shame. In: Müller, C.J. (ed.) Prometheanism, pp. 29–95. Rowman & Littlefield, London (2016)

2. Arendt, H. 1951/2017. The Origins of Totalitarianism. London: Penguin

3. Barber, B.R.: Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press, Oakland (1984)

4. Barthel, M., Mitchell, A., J. Holcomb. ‘Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion’. Pew Research Center Report. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/ (2016). Accessed 15 Dec 2016

5. Beam, M.A., Hutchens, M.J., Hmielowski, J.D.: Facebook news and (De)polarization: reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Inf. Commun. Soc. 21, 940–958 (2017)

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3