Affiliation:
1. Edinburgh Futures Institute, University of Edinburgh
Abstract
Interest in how Artificial Intelligence (AI) could be used within citizens’ assemblies (CAs) is emerging amongst scholars and practitioners alike. In this paper, I make four contributions at the intersection of these burgeoning fields. First, I propose an analytical framework to guide evaluations of the benefits and limitations of AI applications in CAs. Second, I map out eleven ways that AI, especially large language models (LLMs), could be used across a CAs full lifecycle. This introduces novel ideas for AI integration into the literature and synthesises existing proposals to provide the most detailed analytical breakdown of AI applications in CAs to date. Third, drawing on relevant literature, four key informant interviews, and the Global Assembly on the Ecological and Climate crisis as a case study, I apply my analytical framework to assess the desirability of each application. This provides insight into how AI could be deployed to address existing challenges facing CAs today as well as the concerns that arise with AI integration. Fourth, bringing my analyses together, I argue that AI integration into CAs brings the potential to enhance their democratic quality and institutional capacity, but realising this requires the deliberative community to proceed cautiously, effectively navigate challenging trade-offs, and mitigate important concerns that arise with AI integration. Ultimately, this paper provides a foundation that can guide future research concerning AI integration into CAs and other forms of democratic innovation.
Publisher
University of Westminster Press
Reference53 articles.
1. Five design principles for crowdsourced policymaking: Assessing the case of crowdsourced off-road traffic law in Finland;Aitamurto, T.Landemore, H. E.;Journal of Social Media for Organizations,2015
2. Emancipation cannot be programmed: blind spots of algorithmic facilitation in online deliberation;Alnemr, N.;Contemporary Politics,2020
3. Facilitating inclusion: Austrian wisdom councils as democratic innovation between consensus and diversity;Asenbaum, H.;Journal of Deliberative Democracy,2016
4. Fine-Tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferences;Bakker, M.Chadwick, M.Sheahan, H.Tessler, M.Campbell-Gillingham, L.Balaguer, J.McAleese, N.Glaese, A.Aslanides, J.Botvinick, M.Summerfield, C.;Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2022