Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Citizens’ Assemblies: Benefits, Concerns and Future Pathways

Author:

McKinney Sammy1

Affiliation:

1. Edinburgh Futures Institute, University of Edinburgh

Abstract

Interest in how Artificial Intelligence (AI) could be used within citizens’ assemblies (CAs) is emerging amongst scholars and practitioners alike. In this paper, I make four contributions at the intersection of these burgeoning fields. First, I propose an analytical framework to guide evaluations of the benefits and limitations of AI applications in CAs. Second, I map out eleven ways that AI, especially large language models (LLMs), could be used across a CAs full lifecycle. This introduces novel ideas for AI integration into the literature and synthesises existing proposals to provide the most detailed analytical breakdown of AI applications in CAs to date. Third, drawing on relevant literature, four key informant interviews, and the Global Assembly on the Ecological and Climate crisis as a case study, I apply my analytical framework to assess the desirability of each application. This provides insight into how AI could be deployed to address existing  challenges  facing  CAs  today  as  well  as  the  concerns  that  arise  with  AI  integration.  Fourth, bringing my analyses together, I argue that AI integration into CAs brings the potential to enhance their democratic quality and institutional capacity, but realising this requires the deliberative community to proceed cautiously, effectively navigate challenging trade-offs, and mitigate  important concerns that arise with AI integration. Ultimately, this paper provides a foundation that can guide future research concerning AI integration into CAs and other forms of democratic innovation.

Publisher

University of Westminster Press

Reference53 articles.

1. Five design principles for crowdsourced policymaking: Assessing the case of crowdsourced off-road traffic law in Finland;Aitamurto, T.Landemore, H. E.;Journal of Social Media for Organizations,2015

2. Emancipation cannot be programmed: blind spots of algorithmic facilitation in online deliberation;Alnemr, N.;Contemporary Politics,2020

3. Facilitating inclusion: Austrian wisdom councils as democratic innovation between consensus and diversity;Asenbaum, H.;Journal of Deliberative Democracy,2016

4. Fine-Tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferences;Bakker, M.Chadwick, M.Sheahan, H.Tessler, M.Campbell-Gillingham, L.Balaguer, J.McAleese, N.Glaese, A.Aslanides, J.Botvinick, M.Summerfield, C.;Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3