Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Competencies: Analysing the Impact of Contributing Factors

Author:

Krell MoritzORCID,Khan Samia,Vergara ClaudiaORCID,Cofré HernánORCID,Mathesius Sabrina,Krüger DirkORCID

Abstract

Abstract Scientific reasoning competencies (SRC) are one part of science teachers’ professional competencies. This study examines the contribution of three factors to the development of pre-service science teachers’ SRC: the amount of science education classes, the amount of science classes and the pre-service science teachers’ age. The factors amount of science education classes and amount of science classes have been operationalised in terms of ECTS credit points. N = 438 pre-service science teachers from six universities in Germany, Chile and Canada voluntarily and anonymously responded to an established multiple-choice instrument for assessing SRC, which has been developed by the authors and is available in German, Spanish and English. Multiple linear regression analyses show that the included factors explain a proportion of about 9% of the pre-service science teachers’ SRC. The factor amount of science classes is the only significant predictor and can be seen as an indicator of learning science content knowledge. These findings support the assumption of science content knowledge being a prerequisite for developing pre-service science teachers’ SRC.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

International Cooperation program for attraction of advanced human capital

UBC-FUB Joint Funding Scheme

IPN – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik an der Universität Kiel

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference63 articles.

1. Acock, A. (2014). A gentle introduction to Stata. Stata Press.

2. AERA, APA, & NCME [American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education.] (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American educational research association.

3. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 25–48). Springer, US.

4. BCMOE [British Columbia Ministry of Education.] (2019). BC’s new curriculum: Science. Retrieved from: https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/science

5. Berland, L., Schwarz, C., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 1082–1112.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3