Abstract
AbstractTransition zones in railway tracks are locations with a significant variation of track properties (i.e. foundation stiffness) encountered near structures such as bridges and tunnels. Due to strong amplification of the track’s response, transition zones are prone to rapid degradation. To investigate the degradation mechanisms in transition zones, researchers have developed a multitude of models, some of them being very complex. This study compares three solution methods, namely an integral-transform method, a time-domain method, and a hybrid method, with the goal of solving these systems efficiently. The methods are compared in terms of accuracy, computational efficiency, and feasibility of application to more complex systems. The model employed in this paper consists of an infinite, inhomogeneous, and piecewise-linear 1-D structure subjected to a moving constant load. Although the 1-D model is not particularly demanding computationally, it is used to make qualitative observations as to which method is most suitable for the 2-D and 3-D models, which could lead to significant gains. Results show that all three methods can reach similar accuracy levels, and in doing so, the time-domain method is most computationally efficient. The integral-transform method appears to be efficient in dealing with frequency-dependent parameters, while the time-domain and hybrid methods are efficient in dealing with a smooth nonlinearity. For multi-dimensional models, if nonlinearities and inhomogeneities are considered throughout the depth, the time-domain method is likely to be most efficient; however, if nonlinearities and inhomogeneities are limited to the surface layers, the integral-transform and hybrid methods have the potential to be more efficient than the time-domain one. Finally, although the 1-D model presented in this study is mainly used to assess the three methods, it can also be used for preliminary designs of transition zones in railway tracks.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Applied Mathematics,Mechanical Engineering,Ocean Engineering,Aerospace Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference52 articles.
1. Ginzburg, V.L., Tsytovich, V.N.: Transition Radiation and Transition Scattering. Hilger, Bristol (1990)
2. Ginzburg, V.L., Frank, I.M.: Radiation arising from a uniformly moving electron as the electron crosses from one medium into another. J. Exp. Theoret. Phys. 16, 15–30 (1946)
3. Li, D., Davis, D.: Transition of railroad bridge approaches. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131(11), 1392–1398 (2005)
4. Coelho, B., Hölscher, P., Priest, J., Powrie, W., Barends, F.: An assessment of transition zone performance. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 225(2), 129–139 (2011)
5. Steenbergen, M.J.M.M.: Physics of railroad degradation: the role of a varying dynamic stiffness and transition radiation processes. Comput. Struct. 124, 102–111 (2013)