Abstract
AbstractThis study is to evaluate the performance of fully Bayesian information criteria, namely, LOO, WAIC and WBIC in terms of the accuracy in determining the number of latent classes of a mixture IRT model while comparing it to the conventional model via non-random walk MCMC algorithms and to further compare their performance with conventional information criteria including AIC, BIC, CAIC, SABIC, and DIC. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to evaluate these criteria under different situations. The results indicate that AIC, BIC, and their related CAIC and SABIC tend to select the simpler model and are not recommended when the actual data involve multiple latent classes. For the three fully Bayesian measures, WBIC can be used for detecting the number of latent classes for tests with at least 30 items, while WAIC and LOO are suggested to be used together with their effective number of parameters in choosing the correct number of latent classes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Clinical Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Analysis
Reference57 articles.
1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19:716–723
2. Al Hakmani R, Sheng Y (2019) NUTS for mixture IRT models. In: Wiberg M, Culpepper S, Janssen R, González J, Molenaar D (eds) Quantitative psychology. Springer, New York, pp 25–37
3. Andrich D (1978) A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43(4):561–573
4. Bilir MK (2009) Mixture item response theory-MIMIC model: simultaneous estimation of differential item functioning for manifest groups and latent classes. Doctoral dissertation. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (Order No. 3399179)
5. Birnbaum A (1968) Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In: Lord FM, Novick MR (eds) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 397–479
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献