Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Total hip replacement (THR) is considered one of the most effective medical procedures in treatment of osteoarthritis. Since its introduction, there has been a worldwide debate over proper implant selection in terms of size, bearing type and shape. Following study was designed to assess the importance of femoral head size in long-term follow-up.
Materials and methods
A cohort of 30 patients with primary end stage osteoarthritis who underwent total hip replacement was analysed retrospectively. A homogenous group was chosen with no major differences in BMI. Patients’ gait parameters were measured in a biomechanics laboratory using the 3D BTS Smart system. WOMAC and VAS questionnaires were used to assess patient reported outcome.
Results
The subgroup with larger implant head size had several outcomes significantly superior to the subgroup with standard head size and non-inferior to healthy hips. Following variables were measured during this study: time of support phase, time of swing phase, double support time, walking hip extension angle.
Conclusions
Use of larger sized femoral heads during THR gives better results in terms of gait pattern. Since restoring the gait pattern is one of the aspects of rehabilitation and returning to daily activities it seems to be an important observation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Surgery
Reference47 articles.
1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370(9597):1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
2. Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, Cleveland JD (2019) Rates of total joint replacement in the united states: future projections to 2020–2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol 46(9):1134–1140. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170990 (Epub 2019 Apr 15 PMID: 30988126)
3. Tsikandylakis G, Mohaddes M, Cnudde P, Eskelinen A, Kärrholm J, Rolfson O (2018) Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 3(5):225–231. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.3.170061 (Published 2018 May 21)
4. Yin S, Zhang D, Du H, Du H, Yin Z, Qiu Y (2015) Is there any difference in survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with different bearing surfaces? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(11):21871–21885 (Published 2015 Nov 15)
5. López-López JA, Humphriss RL, Beswick AD et al (2017) Choice of implant combinations in total hip replacement: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 359:j4651. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4651 (Published 2017 Nov 2)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献