Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Minimally invasive approaches (MIS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) show inconsistent findings regarding planning adherence in digital templating. The purpose of this study is to evaluate any difference in planning adherence between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and an anterolateral MIS approach (AL MIS) in cementless short stem THA.
Methods
A single surgeon series of 222 THAs in 208 patients with an uncemented short curved stem and a bi-hemispherical acetabular cup were screened for inclusion. A total of 118 THAs were implanted via the DAA and 72 THAs via the AL MIS were included. The planning adherence for the offset option, stem size and the acetabular cup were retrospectively evaluated.
Results
Planning adherence for cup size (perfect match: p = 0.763; ± 1 size: p = 0.124), offset option (0.125) and stem size (perfect match: p = 0.275; ± 1 size: p = 0.552) did not show any statistical significance. Preoperative diagnosis of avascular necrosis of the femoral head in AL MIS approach (OR 6.045; CI 1.153–31.696) or mild hip dysplasia in the general cohort poses (OR 11.789; CI 1.386–100.293) a significant risk for inadequate prediction of the offset option. Conclusion: digital templating for THA with an uncemented short curved stem and a bi-hemispherical acetabular cup show comparable results between a direct anterior approach and a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in supine position. Surgeons should be aware of a low planning adherence for this type of short stem in minimally invasive approaches.
Conclusion
Digital templating for THA with an uncemented short curved stem and a bi-hemispherical acetabular cup show comparable results between a direct anterior approach and a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in supine position. Surgeons should be aware of a low planning adherence for this type of short stem in minimally invasive approaches.
Funder
Johannes Kepler University Linz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Surgery
Reference20 articles.
1. Gkagkalis G, Goetti P, Mai S, Meinecke I, Helmy N, Bosson D et al (2019) Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient—is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study. BMC Geriatr 19(1):112
2. Gustke K (2012) Short stems for total hip arthroplasty: initial experience with the Fitmore stem. J Bone Jt Surg Br 94(11):47–51
3. Luger M, Hochgatterer R, Klotz MC, Hipmair G, Gotterbarm T, Schauer B. Digital templating for the implantation of a curved short hip stem with an anterolateral MIS approach shows gender differences in digital templating. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021.
4. Schmidutz F, Steinbruck A, Wanke-Jellinek L, Pietschmann M, Jansson V, Fottner A (2012) The accuracy of digital templating: a comparison of short-stem total hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36(9):1767–1772
5. Jung S, Neuerburg C, Kappe T, Wernerus D, Reichel H, Bieger R (2012) Validity of digital templating in total hip arthroplasty: impact of stem design and planner’s experience. Z Orthop Unfall 150(4):404–408
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献