Automatic detection of procedural knowledge in robotic-assisted surgical texts

Author:

Bombieri MarcoORCID,Rospocher MarcoORCID,Dall’Alba DiegoORCID,Fiorini PaoloORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The automatic extraction of knowledge about intervention execution from surgical manuals would be of the utmost importance to develop expert surgical systems and assistants. In this work we assess the feasibility of automatically identifying the sentences of a surgical intervention text containing procedural information, a subtask of the broader goal of extracting intervention workflows from surgical manuals. Methods We frame the problem as a binary classification task. We first introduce a new public dataset of 1958 sentences from robotic surgery texts, manually annotated as procedural or non-procedural. We then apply different classification methods, from classical machine learning algorithms, to more recent neural-network approaches and classification methods exploiting transformers (e.g., BERT, ClinicalBERT). We also analyze the benefits of applying balancing techniques to the dataset. Results The architectures based on neural-networks fed with FastText’s embeddings and the one based on ClinicalBERT outperform all the tested methods, empirically confirming the feasibility of the task. Adopting balancing techniques does not lead to substantial improvements in classification. Conclusion This is the first work experimenting with machine / deep learning algorithms for automatically identifying procedural sentences in surgical texts. It also introduces the first public dataset that can be used for benchmarking different classification methods for the task.

Funder

European Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Surgery,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Biomedical Engineering

Reference30 articles.

1. Abbas M, Ali K, Memon S, Jamali A, Memon S, Ahmed A (2019) Multinomial Naive Bayes classification model for sentiment analysis. IJCSNS Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 19(3):62–67

2. Agarwal S, Atreja, S, Agarwal V (2020) Extracting procedural knowledge from technical documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10156

3. Alsentzer E, Murphy J, Boag W, Weng WH, Jin D, Naumann T, McDermott M (2019) Publicly available clinical BERT embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 2nd clinical natural language processing workshop, Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, pp 72–78

4. Batista G, Prati R, Monard MC (2004) A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data. SIGKDD Explor 6:20–29

5. Cawley GC, Talbot NLC (2010) On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J Mach Learn Res 11(70):2079–2107

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3