Abstract
AbstractPoliticians are increasingly describing immigrants as dangerous and threatening criminals. The criminal immigrant, i.e., ‘crimmigrant’ has become a useful symbol, especially for the emerging radical-right parties in the Nordic countries. This article fuses crimmigration research with studies of political debates, to explore the current parliamentary debate on crimmigrants in Sweden. It looks at how, when, and why politicians link immigrants to crime, and strangers to danger. The empirical analysis identifies five narrative characters that are discussed in the Swedish political debate on immigrants and crime. The study shows that even firm stereotypes such as the crimmigrant have nuances. It highlights how and when radical-right and mainstream parties contribute to the crimmigrant stereotype, or dispute it. It shows how certain narrative characters are used in politics, and how politicians link immigrants to crime, and strangers to danger.
Funder
Nordic Research Council for Criminology
Stockholm University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference84 articles.
1. Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. London: Routledge.
2. Anderson, B. (2013). Us and them? The dangerous politics of immigration control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Antoine, K. (2022). The Swedish Disconnect. Journal of Critical Mixed Race Studies, 1(2), 92-104.
4. Bäckman, O., Estrada, F., Nilsson, A., Sivertsson, F. (2021). Criminal convictions and immigrant background 1973–2017 in Sweden. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 22(2), 1-20.
5. Barker, V. (2013). Nordic Exceptionalism revisited. Theoretical criminology, 17(1), 5-25.