The value of values-based supply chains: farmer perspective

Author:

Peterson Hikaru Hanawa,Feenstra GailORCID,Ostrom Marcia,Tanaka Keiko,Brekken Christy Anderson,Engelskirchen Gwenael

Abstract

AbstractIn the last few decades, the emergence of mid-scale, intermediated marketing channels that fall between commodity and direct markets has attracted growing interest from scholars for their potential to preserve small and mid-sized farms while scaling up alternative agrifood sourcing. When such mid-scale supply chains are formed among multiple business partners with shared ethics or values related to the qualities of the food and the business relationships along the supply chain, they may be termed “values-based supply chains (VBSCs).” Most of the research on VBSCs to date has relied primarily on a case study approach that investigates the performance of VBSCs from the perspective of VBSC founders or leaders. In contrast, this research seeks out the perspectives of farmers who participate in VBSCs. A nationwide farmer survey conducted in 2017 offers original insights on farmer motivations for participating in VBSCs and how they are being used by farmers relative to other marketing channels. We find that VBSCs serve farms of all sizes. Overall, smaller farms were more likely to market a higher percentage of overall sales through their VBSC and more likely to rank their VBSC as one of the top three marketing channels in their portfolio. But it was the larger farms that were more likely to perceive VBSC-specific benefits. Our findings confirm that while there is a limited volume of product that such regional supply chains can currently handle, farmers view VBSCs as a valuable marketing option that aligns with their own values and preserves their product’s identity.

Funder

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science

Reference39 articles.

1. Agriculture of the Middle. (n.d.) Characterizing agriculture of the middle and values-based food supply chains. http://agofthemiddle.org/?p=140. Accessed 25 November 2019.

2. Bloom, J.D., and C.C. Hinrichs. 2011. Moving local food through conventional food system infrastructure: Value chain framework comparisons and insights. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26 (1): 13–23.

3. Brekken, C., C. Dickson, H. Peterson, G. Feenstra, M. Ostrom, K. Tanaka, and G. Engelskirchen. 2019. Economic impact of values-based supply chain participation on small and mid-size produce farms. Journal of Food Distribution Research 50 (2): 1–26.

4. Brekken, C.A., M. Parks, and M. Lundgren. 2017. Oregon producer and consumer engagement in regional food networks: Motivations and future opportunities. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 7 (4): 79–103. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2017.074.008.

5. Browne, W. P., J. R. Skees, L. E. Swanson, P. B. Thompson, and L. J. Unnevehr. 1992. Sacred cows and hot potatoes: Agrarian myths and agricultural policy. CRC Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3