Mobilizing against the odds. Solidarity in action in the platform economy

Author:

della Porta Donatella,Chesta Riccardo Emilio,Cini Lorenzo

Abstract

AbstractThe relationship between working conditions and the development of collective solidarity has been much debated in sociology over the past century. The article contributes to this debate by exploring two recent cases of worker mobilization in the context of the Italian platform economy, concerning Amazon delivery drivers and food delivery couriers. Both groups developed specific identity frames in the course of their mobilizations in four Italian cities between 2018 and 2019, which differed significantly. The article explains those differences through a theoretical framework that bridges social movement and labor studies. While Amazon delivery drivers adopted a mobilizing strategy aimed narrowly at improving their conditions as Amazon workers, food delivery couriers elaborated a broader identity framing as precarious platform workers. The difference can be connected to specific features of labor organization, in particular regarding the diverse conditions met by digital innovation in the two sectors: While Amazon drivers belong to a technologically advanced segment (e-commerce) of a traditional sector (logistics), food delivery couriers are part of a new, platform-based sector. The article shows how such sectoral variation affected ways of collectively organizing, forms of solidarity and identity framing.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference96 articles.

1. Alberti, G., & Però, D. (2018). Migrating industrial relations migrant workers’ initiative within and outside trade unions. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56, 693–715.

2. Altenried, M. (2020). The platform as factory: Crowdwork and the hidden labor behind artificial intelligence. Capital & Class, 44(2), 145–158.

3. Atzeni, M. (2016). Workplace conflict: Mobilization and Solidarity in Argentina. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

4. Bennett, A. (2004). Case study methods: Design, use, and comparative advantages. In D. Sprinz & T. Nahmias (eds.), Models, number & cases. Methods for studying international relations (pp. 19–55). Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

5. Bieler, A. (2017). Fighting for public water: The first successful European citizens’ initiative, “Water and sanitation are a human right”. Interface: A journal for and about social movements, 9(1), 300–326.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3