Abstract
AbstractThis study combines the type of partners and the number of partnerships’ purposes to assess municipal partnerships’ effectiveness in bringing international aid. First, the study test whether inter-municipal cooperation (homogenous partners) is more effective than inter-governmental cooperation (heterogeneous partners) in increasing international aid at the local level. Second, the study tests whether partnerships with the sole purpose of raising international aid (single purpose) are more effective than partnerships with additional purposes (multiple purposes). Using panel data with 2,431 municipal-year observations, results confirm that inter-governmental partnerships with multiple purposes are the most effective partnership to increase international aid.
Funder
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference71 articles.
1. Abbink, K., Brandts, J., Herrmann, B., & Orzen, H. (2010). Intergroup conflict and intra-group punishment in an experimental contest game. American Economic Review, 100(1), 420–447
2. Agranoff, R. (2005). Managing collaborative performance: Changing the boundaries of the state?. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(1), 18-45.
3. Ahn, T., Isaac, R. M., & Salmon, T. C. (2011). Rent seeking in groups. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(1), 116–125
4. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571
5. Bauer, Z., AbouAssi, K., & Johnston, J. (2020). Cross-sector collaboration formality: The effects of institutions and organizational leaders.Public Management Review,1–23
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献