Author:
Garcia-Queiruga Jacobo,Pena-Verdeal Hugo,Sabucedo-Villamarin Belén,Giraldez Maria J.,Garcia-Resua Carlos,Yebra-Pimentel Eva
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To determine if the Meibomian Gland (MG) secretion quality is associated with symptoms of ocular discomfort, hours of Video Display Terminals (VDT) use, eyelid margin abnormalities, conjunctival hyperemia, and Meibomian Gland Loss Area (MGLA) in a sample of university students.
Methods
An online survey that included an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and an extra question about hours of VDT use recruited an initial sample of 183 participants. Only 120 participants that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were scheduled for a battery of ocular surface and MG specific exam. The tests include: 1) meibometry, 2) slit lamp exploration of eyelid margin abnormalities (irregularity, hyperemia and MG orifices plugging), MG secretion quality and conjunctival hyperemia, and 3) Meibography.
Results
Significant positive correlations between the MG secretion quality and eyelid margin hyperemia, MG orifices plugging, MGLA, nasal conjunctival hyperemia, and temporal conjunctival hyperemia (Spearman Rho; all r>0.186, p<0.042) were found. Multivariate regression found association between OSDI with hours of VDT use (B=0.316, p=0.007), and eyelid hyperemia (B=0.434, p≤ 0.001). A statistical association between MG secretion quality and eyelid margin hyperemia, MG orifices plugging, MGLA and conjunctival hyperemia (Fisher’s exact; all p<0.039) were found. Multivariate regression found association between MG secretion quality with MG orifices plugging (B=0.295, p=0.004) and meibometry (B=-0.001, p=0.029).
Conclusion
Participants with higher values in MG secretion quality have higher values in eyelid margin hyperemia, MG plugging, MGLA, and conjunctival hyperemia. No direct relationship between MG secretion quality and hours of VDT use or OSDI were found.
Funder
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Romero-Blanco C, Rodríguez-Almagro J, Onieva-Zafra MD, Parra-Fernández ML, Prado-Laguna MDC, Hernández-Martínez A (2020) Physical activity and sedentary lifestyle in university students: changes during confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res 17:6567
2. Jonuscheit S, Lam AKC, Schmid KL, Flanagan J, Martin R, Troilo D (2021) COVID-19: ensuring safe clinical teaching at university optometry schools. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J British Coll Ophthalmic Opticians 41:144–156
3. Giannaccare G, Vaccaro S, Mancini A, Scorcia V (2020) Dry eye in the COVID-19 era: how the measures for controlling pandemic might harm ocular surface. Graefe’s Archive Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 258:2567–8
4. Patel S, Henderson R, Bradley L, Galloway B, Hunter L (1991) Effect of visual display unit use on blink rate and tear stability. Optometry Vision Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom 68:888–892
5. Freudenthaler N, Neuf H, Kadner G, Schlote T (2003) ophthalmology e. characteristics of spontaneous eyeblink activity during video display terminal use in healthy volunteers. Graefe’s Archive Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 241:914–20