Abstract
AbstractRecent interest in integrated crop-livestock (ICL) systems has prompted numerous investigations to quantify ecosystem service tradeoffs associated with management. However, few investigations have quantified ICL management effects on net global warming potential (GWP), particularly in semiarid regions. Therefore, we determined net GWP for grazed and ungrazed cropland in a long-term ICL study near Mandan, ND USA. Factors evaluated for their contribution to net GWP included carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions associated with production inputs and field operations, methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation by beef cattle, change in soil carbon stocks, and soil-atmosphere CH4 and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes. Net GWP was significantly greater for grazed cropland (946 kg CO2equiv. ha-1 yr-1) compared to ungrazed cropland (200 kg CO2equiv. ha-1 yr-1) (P=0.0331). The difference in net GWP between treatments was largely driven by emissions from enteric fermentation (602 kg CO2equiv. ha-1 yr-1). Among other contributing factors, CO2 emissions associated with seed production and field operations were lower under ungrazed cropland (P = 0.0015 and 0.0135, respectively), while soil CH4 uptake was greater under grazed cropland (P = 0.0102). Soil-atmosphere N2O flux from each system negated nearly all the CO2equiv. sink capacity accrued from soil carbon stock change. As both production systems resulted in net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to the atmosphere, novel practices that constrain GHG sources and boost GHG sinks under semiarid conditions are recommended.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Soil Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference67 articles.
1. Abagandura GO, Sentürklü S, Singh N, Kumar S, Landblom DG, Ringwall K (2019) Impacts of crop rotational diversity and grazing under integrated crop-livestock system on soil surface greenhouse gas fluxes. PLoS ONE 14(5):e0217069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217069
2. Barsotti JL, Sainju UM, Lenssen AW, Montagne C, Hatfield PG (2013) Net greenhouse gas emissions affected by sheep grazing in dryland cropping systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1012–1025. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0386
3. Benchaar C, Rivest J, Pomar C, Chiquette J (1998) Prediction of methane production from cows using existing mechanistic models and regression equations. J Animal Sci 76:617–627. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.762617x
4. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 – Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed. Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. pp. 363–382
5. Cardoso AS, Berndt A, Leytem A, Alves BJR, de Carvalho IDNO, de Barros Soares LH, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM (2016) Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use. Agric Syst 143:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.007
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献