Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of alkasite with nanofilled resin composite restorations for occlusal caries lesions in permanent molar teeth of children, at one-year follow-up.
Methods
In this randomized controlled clinical trial with parallel design, 38 children aged 7–13 years with occlusal caries lesions on 59 first permanent molars were randomly allocated into two groups, Group 1: Filtek™ Z350XT (nanocomposite) and Group 2: Cention N® (alkasite resin composite). The restorations were evaluated at one year using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Data were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.
Results
All restorations had either Alpha or Bravo scores at one-year follow-up. In Group 1, all restorations scored Alpha, while one restoration each (3.6%) in Group 2 scored Bravo for fracture and marginal adaptation. All restorations in both groups scored Alpha for retention, secondary caries, and post-operative sensitivity. For anatomic form, all restorations in Group 1 scored Alpha, while three (10.7%) restorations in Group 2 had Bravo scores. For marginal discolouration, three restorations in both groups scored Bravo (11.5% and 10.7%, respectively). For surface roughness, one restoration (3.8%) in Group 1 and three restorations in Group 2 (10.7%) scored Bravo. The comparative results between the two groups for all the variables in the USPHS criteria were not statistically significantly different.
Conclusions
The performances of the nanofilled composite and alkasite were clinically acceptable and comparable. Alkasite can be an alternative material for the restoration of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars of children.
Clinical trial registration
The clinical trial was registered at Clinical Trials Registry—India (CTRI Reg no: CTRI/2020/12/029830 Dated: 15/12/2020).
Funder
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Dentistry (miscellaneous),Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference42 articles.
1. Alzraikat H, Burrow MF, Maghaireh GA, Taha NA. Nanofilled resin composite properties and clinical performance: a review. Oper Dent. 2018;43:E173–90.
2. Askikfgajer V, Hainety FS, Hainety AS. FiltekTM Z350 XT Universal Restorative System TM. 3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. 2002. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/631547O/Filtek-z350-xt-technical-product-profile.pdf Accessed 10 Sept 2019.
3. Awad MM, Alshehri T, Alqarni AM, Magdy NM, et al. Evaluation of the bond strength and cytotoxicity of alkasite restorative material. Appl Sci. 2020;10:6175.
4. Bastos NA, Bitencourt SB, Martins EA, De Souza GM. Review of nano-technology applications in resin-based restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33:567–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12699.
5. Bayne SC, Schmalz G. Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9:209–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0017-0.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献