Abstract
AbstractLike many countries, Mainland China is committed to improving process quality in kindergartens (children aged 3 to 6), specifically the quality of teacher–child interactions. The Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS; Pianta, 2008, in Classroom Assessment Scoring System™: Manual K-3, Paul H Brookes Publishing, Baltimore) is a widely used tool to assess and potentially improve interactional quality. While CLASS has been increasingly used by researchers in China, much of the literature has been published in the Chinese language and, thus, is inaccessible to international readers. To overcome this barrier, this scoping review analyzes existing empirical research involving CLASS in Chinese kindergartens. Publications in English and Chinese were considered. Fifty-five peer-reviewed articles published between 2008 and 2023 were included. Most studies were conducted in public kindergartens in urban areas and developed regions of China, adopting quantitative research designs with relatively small sample sizes. We identified six different types of research purposes. Many of the available studies did not follow established CLASS procedures. We conclude that the evidence available for enhancing teacher–child interactional quality and supporting policy reforms in China remains somewhat weak. We encourage Chinese researchers and policymakers to implement CLASS in large-scale teacher performance evaluations and professional development studies.
Funder
Central Reserve Fund at The Education University of Hong Kong, as part of the project “A multi-disciplinary research programme in research on child development”
The Education University of Hong Kong
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference97 articles.
1. Bai, J. (2021). A study on the quality of interaction between teachers and children in language activities in the rural kindergartens of Hotan prefecture: A case study of kindergartens in the rural area of Luopu county [和田縣域農村幼兒園語言活動中的師幼互動質量探析——以和田洛浦縣農村幼兒園爲例]. Journal of Xinjiang Education Institute, 37(1), 84–88.
2. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Theoretical Model of Human Development (pp. 793–828). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
3. Burchinal, M. (2018). Measuring early care and education quality. Child Development Perspectives, 12(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12260
4. Burchinal, M., Howes, C., & Kontos, S. (2002). Structural predictors of child care quality in child care homes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00132-1
5. Burchinal, M., Kainz, K., & Cai, Y. (2011). How well do our measures of quality predict child outcomes? A meta-analysis and coordinated analysis of data from large-scale studies of early childhood settings. In M. Zaslow, I. Martinez-Beck, K. Tout, & T. Halle (Eds.), Quality measurement in early childhood settings (pp. 11–31). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.