Measuring state-level infant and toddler well-being in the United States: Gaps in data lead to gaps in understanding
-
Published:2022-03-02
Issue:3
Volume:15
Page:1063-1102
-
ISSN:1874-897X
-
Container-title:Child Indicators Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Child Ind Res
Author:
Ryberg ReneeORCID, Wiggins LisaORCID, Moore Kristin A., Daily Sarah, Piña GabrielORCID, Klin AmiORCID
Abstract
AbstractChildren who are nurtured, protected, and supported in the first years of life tend to have better individual outcomes and are more likely to grow to become healthy, productive adults. Child well-being varies across states, yet the field lacks a comprehensive review of infant and toddler indicators measured at the state-level. This paper reviews indicators of well-being from the prenatal period to three years that meet certain a priori criteria. Most of the child-level indicators identified were in the physical health domain; relatively fewer indicators were found in the early cognition and language or social-emotional-behavioral domains. While some states are making progress toward developing integrated early childhood data systems, more work is needed to provide robust data on infant and toddler development. These results highlight the need to develop a broader range of indicators of infant and toddler well-being and improve measurement sources to better inform policies and programs advancing population health.
Funder
Jesse Parker Williams Foundation Marcus Autism Center J. B. Whitehead Foundation Georgia Department of Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology,Health (social science)
Reference53 articles.
1. Bailey, M. J., Timpe, B., & Sun, S. (2020). Prep school for poor kids: The long-run impacts of head start on human capital and economic self-sufficiency (NBER Working Paper No. w28268). https://www.nber.org/papers/w28268 2. Ben-Arieh, A., Kaufman, H. N., Andrews, B. A., Goerge, R., Lee, B.J., & Aber, J.L. (2001). Measuring and monitoring children’s well-being. Kluwer Academic Press. 3. Black, M. M., Walker, S. P., Fernald, L. C. H., Andersen, C. T., DiGirolamo, A. M., Lu, C., McCoy, D. C., Fink, G., Shawar, Y. R., Shiffman, J., Devercelli, A. E., Wodon, Q. T., Vargas-Barón, E., Granthan-McGregor, S., & Lancet Early Childhood Development Series Steering Committee. (2017). Early childhood development coming of age: Science through the life course. Lancet, 389(10064), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31389-7 4. Black, M., Bromley, K., Cavallera, V., Cuartas, J., Dua, T., Eekhout, I., Fik, G., Gladstone, M., Hepworth, K., Janus, M., Kariger, P., Lancaster, G., McCoy, D., McCray, G., Raikes, A., Rubio-Codina, M., van Buuren, S., Waldman, M., Walker, S., & Weber, A. (2019). The Global Scale for Early Development (GSED). Early Childhood Matters. https://earlychildhoodmatters.onlaine/2019/the-global-scale-for-early-development-gsed/?ecm2019 5. Brito, N. H., Fifer, W. P., Amso, D., Barr, R., Bell, M. A., Calkins, S., Flynn, A., Montgomery-Downs, H. E., Oakes, L. M., Richards, J. E., Samuelson, L. M., & Colombo, J. (2019). Beyond the Bayley: Neurocognitive assessments of development during infancy and toddlerhood. Developmental Neuropsychology, 44(2), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2018.1564310
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|