Author:
Hsieh Tung-Hsien,Jywe Wen-Yuh,Zeng Jheng-Jhong,Hsu Chia-Ming,Chang Yu-Wei
Abstract
AbstractTraditional methods for measuring geometric errors in machine tools, including interferometry and Double Ball Bar (DBB), are known to be expensive and time-intensive. Consequently, a non-contact calibration system called the “Laser R-test” has been developed. This innovative system is designed to measure both position-independent geometric errors (PIGEs) and position-dependent geometric errors (PDGEs) efficiently. Since its development in 2000, this tool has been instrumental in analyzing eccentricity errors, angular position errors, and simultaneous trajectory errors. Through extensive research, it has been determined that the total error in a five-axis machine tool can be controlled to below 40 µm after compensating for eccentricity parameters and angular position errors. However, reducing this error to below ± 10 µm is challenging, primarily due to wobble errors in the orientation of the rotary axis without compensating. In this study, a new methodology based on Laser R-test and Rodrigues’ rotation formula has been developed to establish a PIGE model of rotary axis. Based on the methodology, the 8 PIGEs can be analyzed by measuring 5 coordinate positions. The compensation of 8 PIGEs in the rotary axis is completed within 30 min using the inspection path. Compatibility with ISO-10791–6 standards for BK1, BK2, and BK4 path tests is confirmed, validating the compensation effects. A precision of below ± 10 µm is achieved, with inspection time reduced by over 50%. This system can complete multiple errors by simply using the different paths. This greatly reduces the setup time for future users, enhancing its commercial applicability.
Funder
Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Huang ND, Jin YQ, Bi QZ, Wang YH (2015) Integrated postprocessor for 5-axis machine tools with geometric errors compensation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 94:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.04.005
2. Ibaraki S, Nagai Y (2017) Formulation of the influence of rotary axis geometric errors on five-axis on-machine optical scanning measurement-application to geometric error calibration by “chasethe-ball” test. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:4263–4273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0518-4
3. Abbaszadeh-Mir Y, Mayer JRR, Cloutier G, Fortin C (2002) Theory and simulation for the identification of the link geometric errors for a five-axis machine tool using a telescoping magnetic ball-bar. Int J Prod Res 40:4781–4797. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540210164459
4. XR20-W Rotary Axis Calibrator (n.d.) Retrieved September 30, 2023, from http://www.renishaw.com/en/xr20-w-rotary-axis-calibrator--15763
5. ISO 230–2(2014)- Part 2: determination of accuracy and repeatability of positioning of numerically controlled axes. Retrieved August, 2023, from https://www.iso.org/standard/55295.html
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献