Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference121 articles.
1. Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., & Wilson, M. (2012). The Rasch rating model and the disordered threshold controversy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 547–573.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, and NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
3. Andreychik, M. R., & Gill, M. J. (2014). Do natural kind beliefs about social groups contribute to prejudice? Distinguishing bio-somatic essentialism from bio-behavioral essentialism, and both of these from entitativity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(4), 454–474.
4. Andrich, D. (2013). An expanded derivation of the threshold structure of the polytomous Rasch model that dispels any “threshold disorder controversy”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 78–124.
5. Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. J. Exp. Soc. bastPsychol., 42, 228–235.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献